Grover Norquist

Is it right for one man to have so much power in the United States that he can control elections? We seem to have such a man in Grover Norquist. He is a 55 year old Harvard graduate who worked for Ronald Reagan and originated something called, “The Pledge.” Politicians  who take The Pledge promise that they will never, under any circumstances, vote to raise taxes on anyone. Two hundred and seventy nine (279)Republicans, all sitting members of congress,  have taken this pledge.

Norquist heads up an organization called Americans for Tax Reform, a groups whose ‘not for profit’ status makes it possible for them to conceal their funding sources.

So what is it that gives Grover Norquist and his group so much power? If you are a politician running for office and you violate your pledge, he and his wealthy backers will end your career by financially supporting your opponent and/or by causing voter retaliation of your constituents.

Consider that Mr. Norquist has lobbied Congress for communication laws  and The Keystone Pipeline which would transport crude oil with all its inherent dangers,  from the oil sands of Alberta, Canada through the center of the United States to the Gulf of Texas. Both communications and oil are very powerful and wealthy  interest groups.

I find it hard to envision an America without Social Security, Medicare, welfare assistance, and unemployment assistance. So does Alan Simpson, a former Republican Senator and co-chair of The Deficit  Commission which failed to decrease our national deficit by even one cent.

Senator Simpson has been quoted as saying our country is in such dire circumstances that taxes are inevitable.  He went on to say, “It’s hard to imagine what more House Republicans could learn from conservative lobbyist Grover Norquist after they’ve already embraced his hyper-partisanship and his protection of tax breaks for Big Oil and billionaires, at the expense of Medicare and causing a payroll tax increase.”

Simpson (18 years a United States Senator from Wyoming) stated that Grover Norquist advocates “no taxes under any situation even if the country goes to Hell.”

Let’s be clear. I’m not advocating blindly raising taxes but it is hard to justify irresponsible tax breaks for the big oil companies and the mega-rich. Maybe it’s time for congress to quit acting like a bunch of clickish, bratty high school kids. Get to know one another. Have drinks and dinner together. Seek to form friendships across party lines. Do what we thought we elected you to do. WORK THIS OUT!



6 Responses to Grover Norquist

  • wendy kase says:

    It seems to defeat the point of having an elected official from your state, ostensibly to represent your state’s particular issues and people, sign a blind, rigid pledge like this. I doubt anyone voting for these senators actually wanted them to take such a blanket pledge, to never raise taxes for anyone, EVER, without ever being able to consider each state’s need specifically. He is way too powerful and not an elected official. What could he have done to earn their loyalty? Blind loyalty? And, if they are never to raise taxes, what about the payroll taxes and no new taxes on the middle class? It’s crazy and unequal and already broken.

  • Bill W says:

    Well said Beth. This is has also been on my mind of late. I am confident many others as well.

    Think you ought say it again in public media opinion sections.

  • anonymous says:

    Taxing the Middle class is the only tax this group “LOVES”. Well, I think it can be no clearer than what is going on now. Maybe Obama should have said ” let the taxes expire for the middle class” and it would have already been approved. and Dear Grover is a lobbyist for Keystone and guess what it is in the proposal that the republicans added to this bill when the president said he wanted a clean bill with a up and down vote. The keystone pipeline, a pay 90 day pay freeze for Gov. employees, Drug testing for unemployment recipients, things that have nothing to do with a tax this cut. Can it be any clearer??

    • Beth says:

      Attaching riders to bills is a long-time practice of both parties. However, adding the Keystone pipeline XL was a directly aimed at President Obama in order to put him between a rock and a hard place. We who deplore such actions should let our voices be heard both by calls and in the voting booth. Thanks for your comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Facebook Page
"Like" My Author Page
On Facebook

Facebook like


Fill out the form below to sign-up to our blog newsletter and we'll drop you a line when new articles come up.

Our strict privacy policy keeps your email address 100% safe & secure.